02 Jan Watch the video

DeVry MGMT520 week 1 Video case study latest 2016 november

Week 1: Assignment

In each week the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read through the week’s chapters and lecture.

Clearly identify your work with your name, the date, the week number and the assignmentname, and upload work to the Dropbox.

The questions are designed to probe the higher levels of thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating and creating, and so there often are no correct answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate, and create alternative solutions to the various issues presented while arguingand debating the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.

Terminal Course Objective: A

Video Case Study: Court Systems and Jurisdiction—Supreme Court Sides WithWalmart

http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Court_Sys.html

Watch the video case study and then write a one- to two-page reflective paper (double spaced) on the following questions while discussing the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.

1. This story is about the Supreme Court’s decision. What process did this case have to go through to get to the Supreme Court?

2. In the story, two justices wrote differing opinions about the issue. Discuss the differences between a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion. What effect does each type of opinion have on the state of the law in America?

3.What type of jurisdiction did the federal courts have in this case? Was it a federal question case or a diversity of citizenship case? Why?

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.

Submit your assignment to the Dropbox.

DeVry MGMT520 week 2 case study latest 2016 november

Week2: Assignment

In each week the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read through the week’s chapters and lecture.

Clearly identify your work with your name, the date, the week number and the assignment name, and upload work to the Dropbox.

The questions are designed to probe the higher levels of thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating and creating, and so there often are no “correct” answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate and create alternative solutions to the various issues presented while arguing and debating the connections between business, law, politics and ethics.

Terminal Course Objective: G

Based on your reading, write a 1-2 page reflective paper (double spaced) on the following questions while discussing the connections between business, law, politics and ethics.

One:There has been a movement in the last decade encouraging people to “buy American.” Discuss the legal and ethical issues related to boycotting goods from other countries. What are the practical business implications of such a move?

Two:The World Trade Organization, or WTO, is the largest and most influential of the trade organizations. China and other heavy counterfeiting nations are part of this group. What could WTO-participating nations do to address the problems of counterfeiting? What should they do?

Three:The United Nations Security Council, the main decision-making body at the UN, is comprised of five regular members: China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. Ten more members are elected from the General Assembly. Given the make-up of the committee, what type of action might the UN take with regard to the counterfeiting issue?

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.

Submit your assignmentto the Dropbox.

DeVry MGMT520 week 3 Video Case Study latest 2016 november

Week 3: Assignment

In each week, the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read through the week’s chapters and lecture.

Clearly identify your work with your name, the date, the week number and the assignment name, and upload work to the Dropbox.

The questions are designed to probe the higher levels of thinking and learning, such as analyzing, evaluating, and creating, and so there often are no correct answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate, and create alternative solutions to the various issues presented while arguing and debating the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.

Terminal Course Objective: E

Video Case Study: Environmental Protection—Environmental Victory

http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Env_Prot.html

Watch the video case study and then write a one- to two-page reflective paper (double spaced) on the following questions while discussing the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.

1. The idea of global warming has not been universally accepted. Discuss how the law must balance competing scientific opinions and make decisions in light of uncertainty. How should this be done?

2. Discuss the different stakeholders who have concern in this situation. What are their interests, and which stakeholder should have the priority position?

3. Environmental law is both federal and state-controlled. Discuss the effect on state regulations if the federal government, through the Environmental Protection Agency, changes the standards for air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions.

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.

Submit your assignmentto the Dropbox.

DeVry MGMT520 Week 4 Midterm latest 2016 november

The idea of global warming has not been universally accepted. Discuss how the law must balance competing scientific opinions and make decisions in light of uncertainty. How should this be done?

Discuss the different stakeholders who have concern in this situation. What are their interests, and which stakeholder should have the priority position?

Environmental law is both federal and state-controlled. Discuss the effect on state regulations if the federal government, through the Environmental Protection Agency, changes the standards for air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions.

DeVry MGMT520 week 5 Video case study latest 2016 november

Week 5: Assignment

In each week the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read through the week’s chapters and lesson.

Clearly identify your work with your name, the date, the week number, and the assignment name, and upload work to the Dropbox.

The questions are designed to probe the higher levels of thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating, and creating, and so there often are no correct answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate and create alternative solutions to the various issues presented while arguing and debating the connections between business, law, politics and ethics.

Terminal Course Objective: D

Video Case Study: Equal Opportunity in Employment—Isiah Thomas

http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Equal_Opp.html

Watch the video case study and then write a one- to two-page reflective paper (double spaced) on the following questions while discussing the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.

1. Discuss whether there should be a different standard of behavior in the workplace compared to personal relationships.

2. According to the video, Isiah Thomas put his arm around the victim, tried to kiss her on the cheek, called her sexually charged names, and made her feel uncomfortable on the job. Discuss how a court should determine what constitutes sexual harassment and what does not. Should culture play any part in that determination?

3. As part of this case, Madison Square Garden had to pay the victim because of retaliation – she was fired for reporting the sexual harassment. In this case, the jury determined sexual harassment occurred, that she complained to the appropriate parties, and was fired for that. Given the dollar amounts discussed in the video, discuss the risk that false sexual harassment claims might be filed and what might be done to prevent that.

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.

Submit your assignmentto the Dropbox.

DeVry MGMT520 week 6 Video case study latest 2016 november

Week6: Assignment

In each week, the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read through the week’s chapters and lecture.

Clearly identify your work with your name, the date, the week number, and the assignment name, and upload work to the Dropbox.

The questions are designed to probe the higher levels of thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating and creating, and so there often are no correct answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate and create alternative solutions to the various issues presented while arguing and debating the connections between business, law, politics and ethics.

Terminal Course Objective: F, G

Video Case Study: Consumer Protection and Product Safety—Vitamin Water Advertising Claims

http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Cons_Prot.html

Watch the video case study and then write a one- to two-page reflective paper (double spaced) on the following questions while discussing the connections between business, law, politics and ethics.

1. According to the video, Coca Cola advertises that Vitamin Water will give people protection similar to exercise or flu shots. Discuss whether this is deceptive advertising or mere promotion.

2. Vitamin Water responds to the claim by stating that the ingredients are clearly on the label. Discuss whether manufacturers have any duty to warn the public about their products or whether the law should adopt the idea of “buyer beware” so that consumers read the labels.

3. Near the end of the video clip, the health and medical editor states that washing hands and drinking water will keep one healthier than most of the health products on the market. Should Congress or the states be more assertive about regulating products based on health issues or is that too much like big brother watching?

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.

Submit your assignmentto the Dropbox.

DeVry MGMT520 week 7 Video case study latest 2016 november

Week7: Assignment

In each week, the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read the week’s chapters and lecture.

Clearly identify your work with your name, the date, the week number, and the assignment name, and upload your work to the Dropbox.

The questions are designed to probe the higher levels of thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating, and creating, and so there often are no correct answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate, and create alternative solutions to the various issues presented while arguing and debating the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.

Terminal Course Objectives: A and G

Video Case Study: Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution – Arbitrators Favoring Creditors

http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Jud_Alt.html

Watch the video case study and then write a one- to two-page reflective paper (double-spaced) on the following questions while discussing the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.

One: What is the difference between arbitration and litigation? What steps in the litigation process are missing in arbitration?

Two: If the parties to arbitration instead went to court, discuss the steps that the parties would have to take in order to go to trial.

Three: The story talked about repeat players—companies that end up in arbitration repeatedly over time. Because arbitrators are selected by a negotiation between the two parties in the arbitration, this story indicates they are more likely to find for these repeat players. Discuss the ethics of this conflict of interest and what might be done to overcome the problem.

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc.

Submit your assignment to the Dropbox.