14 Jan Copy and Paste it here as your

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 1 Discussion

Clinical consequences of Drug Binding

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

During the process of drug distribution a number of drugs are highly protein bound.

What does this indicate and what are the clinical consequences?

Peer Response: Unit 1, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Clinical consequences of Drug Binding

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 2 Discussion

Diabetic Hypertensive Complications

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Diabetic hypertensive patients have a higher risk of developing complications with an increased mortality.

What are some of these complications and what is the ideal way to treat a diabetic hypertensive patient?

Peer Response: Unit 2, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Diabetic Hypertensive Complications

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 1 hour

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 3 Discussion

Beta Blockers

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Beta blockers are considered to be an important inclusion in the regimen used to treat heart failure.

Discuss the role of the beta blockers in the treatment of heart failure and its mechanism of action.

Peer Response: Unit 3, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Beta Blockers

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 1 hour

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 4 Discussion

Use of Statins

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Discuss the mechanism of action and clinical indications for the use of statins, considering age, ethnicity, and economic factors.

Peer Response: Unit 4, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Use of Statins

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 5 Discussion

Asthma and COPD

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Bronchial hypersensitivity and asthma have several treatment approaches. Prophylactic therapy is also crucial in many patients.

Discuss the mechanisms of action of drugs used to treat asthma and COPD.

Peer Response: Unit 5, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Asthma and COPD

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 6 Discussion

Penicillin Hypersensitivity

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Penicillin hypersensitivity limits your use of antimicrobials.

How are patients managed with penicillin hypersensitivity?

Identify the steps you would take to assist your patient?

Peer Response: Unit 6, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Penicillin Hypersensitivity

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 7 Discussion

Pregnant Patient

Pregnant Patient

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

A patient who is 14 weeks pregnant presents with symptoms of anxiety and also indicates that she has episodes of panic attacks.

Brainstorm the ideal treatment strategies used then discuss how to treat this patient pharmacologically?

How do these drugs work?

Peer Response: Unit 7, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Pregnant Patient

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 8 Discussion

Case Study on Anti-depressants

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Instructions:

Complete the unit 8 assignment in a word document

Copy and Paste it here as your response to this discussion

Also submit it in the Unit 8 Case Study drop box in the Submit Assignments/Assessments area

Since fluoxetine is the SSRI used in the case study, please respond to question 3 ”

What are the side effects of fluoxetine?” with both side effects and potential adverse effects of excessive doses of SSRIs.

This unit 8 discussion post does not require any peer responses and must be submitted by Tuesday at 11:59 of week 8.