02 Feb Documentation of sources

Question
Write a 1,250-1,500 word draft of your business research paper. Use your logic model to develop the sequence for your paper. Include:

Describe the health care administration issue or barrier you are addressing.

Discuss resources needed, including key stakeholders, and the role they play in your plan.

Identify any external or internal regulation that must be considered to ensure compliance with any legislative, institutional, or agency policy or expectation.

Describe the organizational and strategical development structures/processes that address the problem.

Present strategies for communicating your proposed plan

Use the research gathered in your literature review to provide support for paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Rubric

1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less Than Satisfactory

65.00%

3

Satisfactory

75.00%

4

Good

85.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

70.0 %Content

5.0 %Health Care Issue or Barrier

A description of the approved health care issue or barrier is not presented.

An incomplete description of the approved health care administration issue or barrier is presented. Significant detail or evidence is needed to explain the nature of the problem.

A summary of the approved health care administration problem is presented. Some information or detail is needed to fully describe the nature of the problem.

A description of the approved health care administration problem is presented.

The health care administration problem is thoroughly described. Detailed information and strong evidence support the description.

10.0 %Resources Needed for Plan

Resources are not presented.

Few resources have been identified. The relevance of the resources and the role they play in the addressing the problem are not discussed.

Some relevant resources have been identified. A general discussion of the resources is presented. The role the resources play in addressing the health care issue or barrier is somewhat unclear.

Most key resources have been identified. A discussion of the resources and the role they pay in the addressing the problem is presented. The discussion demonstrates why the resources are relevant to addressing the health care issue or barrier.

All key resources have been identified. A detailed discussion of the resources and the role they pay in the addressing the problem is clearly presented. The discussion explains why the resources are relevant to addressing the health care issue or barrier. Detailed information and evidence are provided to support the discussion.

10.0 %Identification of Compliance Requirements

No compliance considerations or requirements are identified.

At least two compliance considerations or requirements are identified. The relevancy of these to the plan is not established. More information or evidence is needed for support. Significant legislative, institutional or agency policy is omitted.

Some key compliance considerations or requirements are identified. A general summary discusses the relevance of these to the plan. Some information or evidence is needed for support. At least one significant legislative, institutional or agency policy is omitted.

Most key compliance considerations or requirements are identified. The relevancy of these to the plan is discussed. Some information or evidence is needed for support.

All significant compliance considerations or requirements are clearly identified. The relevancy of these to the plan is discussed and substantial evidence is provided for support. Additional external or internal regulatory considerations are identified, and strong rationale has been provided to describe significance.

15.0 %Organizational or Strategical Development Plan

No organizational or strategical development plan is identified.

Clear identification of organizational development is missing. Supporting evidence is provided but not valid.

Some components of organizational and strategical development plan are identified. Valid supporting evidence is missing. Some resources are out of date.

Organizational and strategical development plan is identified. Additional information is needed regarding implementation. Some additional evidence is needed for support.

Substantial organizational and strategical development plan is identified. How the plan is to be implemented is clearly identified with strong rationale. Valid evidence is used for support.

15.0 %Communication Strategies for Plan

No strategies are presented to communicate the proposed plan.

A partial strategy for communication is presented. Significant information or detail is needed.

A general strategy for communication is presented. Some aspects of the communication strategy are unclear.

A strategy for communication is presented. The plan suggests a good approach to communicate the proposed plan overall.

A clear strategy for communication is presented. The plan is detailed and proposes effective approaches to communicate the proposed plan to all stakeholders.

15.0 %Evidence Provided to Support Plan

No evidence from the literature review is used to provide support for the plan.

Some evidence from the literature review is used to provide support for the plan. The evidence provided is used inaccurately, or does not provide support for the plan.

Evidence from the literature review is effort to provide support for the plan. More detail or information is needed in order to fully demonstrate support for the plan.

Evidence from the literature review demonstrates support for the overall plan.

Evidence from the literature review is clearly described and organized around ideas in a manner that offers strong support for the various stages of the plan and the plan overall.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage