02 Feb Review the posts of your

Unit 8 discussion

EBP and the Triple AIM

It is important in your practice to take time out to reflect on work that you have already done and decisions you have already made. This can be especially useful when using a specific lens, such at the Triple Aim.

The response for this discussion will contain two parts. You will need to address the bullet points under each part to successfully complete this discussion.

Reflection on EBP and the Triple AIM

Evaluate the degree to which the map you created for the Unit 3 Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map assignment succeeds in achieving aspects of the Triple Aim.

Which aspects of the Triple AIM does your concept map address?

How well would the successful implementation of your concept map achieve the goals of those aspects of the Triple AIM?

In what ways did the evidence you used as the basis for your approach contribute to the achievement of these goals?

Having learned more about EBP and the Triple Aim, how would you revise your concept map to better achieve one or more specific goals of the Triple Aim?

What aspects of the Triple Aim would help you to refine aspects of your previous assignment for the better?

What aspects of the Triple Aim would likely be a hindrance in working to refine your previous assignment? In other words, did you suggest any changes to your assignments to address aspects of the Triple Aim that you do not think would result in better care for the patient?

How simple or challenging was it to find evidence that supported the refinement of your assignment and supported the goals of the Triple Aim?

Cite a minimum of one resource that presents relevant evidence for your proposed revisions.

Evaluate the degree to which your Unit 6 Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan assignment succeeds in achieving aspects of the Triple Aim.

Which aspects of the Triple AIM does your health improvement plan address?

How well would the successful implementation of your health improvement plan achieve the goals of those aspects of the Triple AIM?

In what ways did the evidence you used as the basis for your approach contribute to the achievement of these goals?

Having learned more about EBP and the Triple Aim, how would you revise your health improvement plan to better achieve one or more specific goals of the Triple Aim?

What aspects of the Triple Aim would help you to refine aspects of your previous assignment for the better?

What aspects of the Triple Aim would likely be a hindrance in working to refine your previous assignment? In other words, did you suggest any changes to your assignments to address aspects of the Triple Aim that you do not think would result in better care for the community?

How simple or challenging was it to find evidence that supported the refinement of your assignment and supported the goals of the Triple Aim?

Cite a minimum of one resource that presents relevant evidence for your proposed revisions.

Response Guidelines

Review the posts of your peers and then select two peers to whom you wish to respond. In your response be sure to address the following. Note: Your responses should be substantive and 100-200 words.

Comment on each peer’s evaluation their two assignments and their success at addressing the goals of the Triple Aim.

How did their evaluation compare to your own?

What additional strategies or resources would you suggest your peer consider in their attempts to refine their previous approaches?

Resources

Discussion Participation Scoring Guide.The IHI Triple AIM.