17 Aug You skillfully used time-management to overcome the obstacle

You skillfully used time-management to overcome the obstacles and challenges presented by other responsibilities to successfully complete your program. As a result of your hard work, you have been asked to prepare a presentation and speech to present at the commencement ceremony. Your presentation and speech should describe your journey and what you learned about your yourself as a leader. Include an experience from your first course, and share your future plans. Consider the individuals who helped you achieve this goal. Who do you want to be? This project is your story:1. Start by preparing an outline of your story. Your use of time management personally and professionally Your traits of leadership Your power to influence Your leadership style Your use ethical communication to influence2. Prepare your written speech addressing all the topics identified in your outline. Your speech will be prepared in APA format with citations and references, as required.Consider what you would like to say to your colleagues, CSU-Global faculty, friends, and family as you look back on your journey.Describe who you want to be as you look forward on your journey.Guidelines and Options for Creating the Outline:Your outline should be prepared in Word and submitted as part of your portfolio project.Guidelines for the Written Speech:750 – 1500 words required (not including Title or References pages). In double-spaced APA format. This will coincide with your Audio or Video recording allowing you 6-10 minutes for the Commencement speech.Minimum of 5 academic references (from the Library).CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements60.0 to >48.0 ptsMeets ExpectationThe Portfolio includes all three of the required components, as specified in the assignment including the Outline, Written Speech, and Video Recording.48.0 to >36.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationThe Portfolio includes two of the required components, as specified in the assignment.36.0 to >24.0 ptsBelow ExpectationThe Portfolio includes one of the required components, as specified in the assignment.24.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceThe Portfolio includes some of the required components, however the components are not submitted as specified in the assignment.60.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent- Outline60.0 to >48.0 ptsMeets ExpectationOutline demonstrates strong knowledge of five module topics, as specified in the assignment.48.0 to >36.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationOutline demonstrates adequate knowledge of three-four module topics, as specified in the assignment.36.0 to >24.0 ptsBelow ExpectationOutline demonstrates fair knowledge of two-three module topics, as specified in the assignment.24.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceOutline fails to demonstrate fair knowledge of the module topics, as specified in the assignment.60.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation- Written Speech60.0 to >48.0 ptsMeets ExpectationWritten Speech demonstrates strong synthesis and evaluation of five module topics outlined, as specified in the assignment.48.0 to >36.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationWritten Speech demonstrates adequate synthesis and evaluation of three-four module topics outlined, as specified in the assignment.36.0 to >24.0 ptsBelow ExpectationWritten Speech demonstrates fair synthesis and evaluation of two-three module topics outlined, as specified in the assignment.24.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceWritten Speech fails to demonstrate fair synthesis and evaluation of the module topics outlined, as specified in the assignment.60.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation – Video Recording60.0 to >48.0 ptsMeets ExpectationVideo Recording demonstrates strong synthesis and evaluation of five module topics outlined, as specified in the assignment.48.0 to >36.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationVideo Recording demonstrates adequate synthesis and evaluation of three-four module topics outlined, as specified in the assignment.36.0 to >24.0 ptsBelow ExpectationVideo Recording demonstrates fair synthesis and evaluation of two-three module topics outlined, as specified in the assignment.24.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceVideo Recording fails to demonstrate fair synthesis and evaluation of the module topics outlined, as specified in the assignment.60.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources – Choice and Integration60.0 to >48.0 ptsMeets ExpectationCites and integrates at least five credible sources as specified in the assignment.48.0 to >36.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationCites and integrates at least four credible sources as specified in the assignment.36.0 to >24.0 ptsBelow ExpectationCites and integrates at least three credible sources as specified in the assignment.24.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceCites and integrates less than three credible sources as specified in the assignment.60.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format. Conforms to project requirements for each of the four components, as specified in the assignment.32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is organized, adequately written, and in proper format. Conforms to most of the project requirements, as specified in the assignment.24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements, as specified in the assignment.16.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not well organized or well written and is not in proper format. Does not conform to project requirements, as specified in the assignment.40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style30.0 to >24.0 ptsMeets ExpectationStrong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.24.0 to >18.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSmall number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.18.0 to >12.0 ptsBelow ExpectationInconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.12.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidencePoor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style30.0 to >24.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.24.0 to >18.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.18.0 to >12.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors.12.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors.30.0 pts