23 Aug Think of a time when you were faced with an unethical commun

Think of a time when you were faced with an unethical communication situation. Describe the situation. How did you respond? What was the outcome? If you could face that situation again, what would you do differently and why?Write a 3-4-page paper in APA format.Use one or more articles or credible sources from the CSU-Global library to support your ideas, assertions, and claims.Adhere to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA.ORG300 CT M5ORG300 CT M5CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements10.0 to >9.0 ptsMeets ExpectationIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.9.0 to >7.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.7.0 to >5.0 ptsBelow ExpectationIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.5.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent15.0 to >13.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of cultural leadership styles; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.13.0 to >10.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.10.0 to >7.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.7.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis15.0 to >13.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.13.0 to >10.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.10.0 to >7.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.7.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.10.0 to >9.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.9.0 to >7.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.7.0 to >5.0 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.5.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style10.0 to >9.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.9.0 to >7.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.7.0 to >5.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.5.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 60.0