Developmental Paper (1)
Developmental Paper (1)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation of Concepts

64 ptsExceeds Expectations
Defines and explains two concepts based on the textbook and other literature for definition and explanation. Includes a discussion of the concepts from a trauma-informed lens, paraphrasing and citing related literature.
38.4 ptsMeets Expectations
Defines and explains two concepts and refers to literature other than textbook for definition and explanation. Includes a discussion of the concept from a trauma informed lens, citing related literature; however, there is an excessive use of quotes with citations rather than paraphrasing with citations.
25.6 ptsMarginally Meets Expectations
Defines and explains the concepts without referring to literature. Includes some information about each concept, the corresponding developmental stage, including the key crisis and age range associated with each stage selected for the paper without referring to the text.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectation
Does not define or explain concepts identified. Does not include any information about each concept, the corresponding developmental stage, key crisis or age range associated with each stage selected for the paper.64 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Concepts to Developmental Stages

64 ptsExceeds Expectations
Includes relevant information about the application of each concept to each of the two corresponding developmental stages, from text, including theory, the name of the theorist associated with the theory, the key crisis, and age range associated with each stage selected for the paper.
38.4 ptsMeets Expectations
Includes some information about each concept, the corresponding developmental stage, from text, including the key crisis and age range associated with each stage selected for the paper.
25.6 ptsMarginally Meets Expectations
Includes a discussion of the concepts from a trauma-informed lens, with no references.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectation
Does not Include a discussion of the concept from a trauma-informed lens. .64 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

64 ptsExceeds Expectations
The two developmental concepts are clearly defined, and the writer provides a strong rationale for the application of the selected developmental concepts to each significant event highlighted in the individual’s life. Concepts, assumptions, inferences, & conclusions are clearly and thoroughly expressed. Analysis is logical and thorough.
38.4 ptsMeets Expectations
The two developmental concepts are adequately defined and cited, and the writer provides a satisfactory rationale for the application of the selected developmental concept to each significant event highlighted in the interview. Although theories are identified and concepts are mentioned, there are excessive quotations with citations. The concepts, assumptions, inferences, & conclusions are adequately addressed.
25.6 ptsMarginally Meets Expectations
Concepts, assumptions, inferences & conclusions are inconsistently expressed. The analysis is flawed in some places.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectation
Concepts, assumptions, inferences, & conclusions are unclear; analysis is absent, or logic is flawed.64 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Use of Evidence

64 ptsExceeds Expectations
Uses at least 3 references in addition to the course textbook. Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, and relevant sources. Uses the interviewee’s own words where appropriate, and summary where appropriate.
38.4 ptsMeets Expectations
Appropriately uses 2 references aside from the textbook. Provides a moderately concise summary of interviewee’s narrative; however, does not use interviewee’s own words, or only uses interviewee’s words and fails to provide summary where appropriate.
25.6 ptsMarginally Meets Expectations
Uses 1 reference aside from the textbook. Provides only one definition for a selected developmental concept, and provides a rationale for the application of the selected developmental concept to the one significant event highlighted in the interview. Provides a fairly concise summary of the interviewee’s narrative.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectation
Does not use references other than the textbook. Does not provide a definition for any developmental concepts or fails to provide a rationale for the application of the applied developmental concepts to the significant event(s) highlighted in the interview. Does not provide a concise summary of the interviewee’s narrative.64 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Mechanics

32 ptsExceeds Expectations
The organization is sequential and appropriate to the assignment; paragraphs are well developed; ideas linked with smooth and effective transitions; virtually error-free and reads exceptionally well.
19.2 ptsMeets Expectations
Competent organization and paragraph structure; language has few errors and reads well.
12.8 ptsMarginally Meets Expectations
Limited attempts to organize ideas; paragraphs are simple and/or disconnected; no transitions; writing includes some errors; reading presents with difficulty.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectation
Organization, if at all, is confusing and disjointed; weak paragraph structure; transitions are missing or illogical; errors are numerous and seriously undermine any coherent reading.32 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format & Citations

32 ptsExceeds Expectations
APA format is exceptional in the paper; all sources are cited correctly and thoroughly.
19.2 ptsMeets Expectations
APA format, when used, is accurate in the paper; the majority of sources are cited correctly.
12.8 ptsMarginally Meets Expectations
There are frequent errors in APA format; not all sources are cited correctly.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectation
The format of the document is not recognizable as APA; the reference page is missing or so disorganized it does not represent APA citation style.32 pts
Total Points: 320