10 Sep FlightGear Flight Simulator For this assignment, submit the finished product

FlightGear Flight Simulator

 

For this assignment, submit the finished product containing the detailed information that is aligned with the parameters of the assignment. Projects that do not address this topic or follow the guidelines, but focus instead on other important but irrelevant simulation issues, will not grade well. The paper should have approximately 15-20 pages of content, use at least 15 credible citations, and be prepared using the most current version of APA.

 

Field study and analysis requires 15-20 pages of material excluding the cover page, abstract, tables and figures, references, and appendixes. The paper will be written in the most current version of APA format and should contain the following headings (or similar).

 

 

 

 

General Headings for Field Study and Evaluation

· Abstract

· Introduction

· Simulation Description

· Provides an effective description and develops a coherent, central theme that is supported in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout.

· Methodology

· Comprehensively identifies a specific methodology for evaluating the simulation.and isolates one specific problem. Identifies factors contributing to the problem with accurate details. Substantiates problem statement with external source(s).

· Evaluation – this section may include subsections of:

· Fidelity (Done 2-pages). Professor comment: One thing that I would suggest is showing your positives; i.e. a screen shot of the instrument panel or the equipment used to support the training. One example – some new monitors are huge and have a wrap around type profile that greatly increase the ability to maintain situational awareness. So if you have something along those lines – showing would help support your text.

· Performance

· Strengths & Limitations

· User Interface

· Transfer of Training (500 words) already assigned

· Cost Effectiveness

· Applications for Training

· Or any other subsection you deem necessary

· Recommendations

· Conclusion

· References

 

 

 

 

 

 

Field Study and Evaluation Rubric

 

Simulation Description:

Provides an effective description and develops a coherent, central theme that is supported in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout.

 

Methodology:

Comprehensively identifies a specific methodology for evaluating the simulation.and isolates one specific problem. Identifies factors contributing to the problem with accurate details. Substantiates problem statement with external source(s).

 

Evaluation:

Clearly reports the results of the evaluation in a complete, comprehensive, and supported section. Presents a strong, well-supported argument based on relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks.

 

Recommendation:

Recommendation are clear, reasonable, and thought provoking. The recommendations indicate a thorough understanding of the simulation and possible applications.

 

 

My abstract:

FlightGear Flight Simulator (FGFS) is a free and open-source flight simulator framework developed from contributions by many talented people around the world. The main focus is a desire to `do things right’ and to minimize short cuts. FlightGear has become more configurable and flexible in recent years, making for a massive improvement in the user’s overall experience. (FGFS) have a significant impact on flight safety, training cost, and contributions to the U.S economy in terms of employment and revenue. This customizability of FlightGear is illustrated by the wide range of aircraft models that are available in FlightGear, from gliders to Helicopters, and from airliners to fighter jets. FlightGear has been used and is being used in a wide range of projects in academia, industry (including NASA), and home-built cockpits. (FGFS) has expanded beyond flight aerodynamics, and by now, it offers a broad range of configurable features to recreate flight environments similar to reality. Other features include Google maps based moving up that allows users to observe where other players are. This paper aims to present the history, technology, and environmental constraints of the FlightGear simulator. The paper also presents a complete evaluation of the system and the available lessons. Lastly, it provides recommendations on ways that the FlightGear simulator can be improved.

 

Professor comment:

what I would suggest is that you provide a HOW you will validate your effort. Subject matter (person-s, maneuvers, evaluation profile) etc. You might also explain the system – PC, monitor, joysticks, rudder peddles etc .

 

 

 

Helpful Resources:

 

Zhang, H. M., & Li, L. (2013). A flight evaluating system using flight gear. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 347-350, 891. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.347-350.891

 

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a303799.pdf

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658361215000141