02 Dec As a future leader on a school campus, it will be important to support new teachers. You will want to create a new teacher induction that is supportive and relevant. New teachers will ben
As a future leader on a school campus, it will be important to support new teachers. You will want to create a new teacher induction that is supportive and relevant. New teachers will benefit from feeling welcomed, being introduced to the school culture, and learning about school policy and procedures.
Allocate at least 3 hours in the field to support this field experience.
Begin this field experience by reviewing the induction plan and materials used by the school to onboard new teachers. Collaborate with your principal mentor to identify a new teacher who is willing to provide feedback about his or her teacher induction process. If you and your principal mentor are unable to identify a new teacher, locate a teacher with less than three years of teaching experience.
Include the following questions in your interview with the new teacher:
- What did your induction include?
- How beneficial was the induction in:
- Setting up your classroom
- Getting ready for and starting the first day
- Managing your class and students individually
- Understanding the school culture, mission, and vision
- Getting to know other faculty and staff
- What went well?
- What could be improved?
- What do you know now that should have been included in the induction plan?
- Ask at least two more questions of your choice.
Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the principal mentor and, provided permission, seek opportunities to observe and/or assist the principal mentor.
Complete a 250-500 word reflection on your experiences. Incorporate PSEL Standards 6 and 7 into your reflection, along with any additional PSEL standards you see fit, and describe how you will apply what you have learned to your future professional practice.
APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, but solid academic writing is expected. The PSEL standards should be referenced using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Clinical Field Experience B: Improving New Teacher Induction Strategies –
Rubric
Bene�ts of Induction Plan 10 points
Criteria Description
Benefits of Induction Plan
5. Target 10 points
Reflection explicitly explains what the induction plan included and expertly includes
how beneficial the plan is in the specified areas.
4. Acceptable 8.7 points
Reflection clearly explains what the induction plan included and reasonably
includes how beneficial the plan is in the specified areas.
3. Approaching 7.4 points
Reflection marginally explains what the induction plan included and vaguely
includes how beneficial the plan is in the specified areas.
2. Insufficient 6.9 points
Reflection irrelevantly explains what the induction plan included and does not
include how beneficial the plan is in the specified areas.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Teacher Induction Plan Interview 10 points
Criteria Description
Teacher Induction Plan Interview
5. Target 10 points
Reflection on the teacher induction plan interview, including discussion of plan
strengths and opportunities for improvement, is thorough and includes substantial
supporting details.
4. Acceptable 8.7 points
Collapse All
Reflection on the teacher induction plan interview, including discussion of plan
strengths and opportunities for improvement, is complete and contains supporting
details.
3. Approaching 7.4 points
Reflection on the teacher induction plan interview, including discussion of plan
strengths and opportunities for improvement, is vague and lacks supporting details.
2. Insufficient 6.9 points
Reflection on the teacher induction plan interview, including discussion of plan
strengths and opportunities for improvement, is incomplete.
1. No Submission 0 points
New Knowledge and Two More Questions 5 points
Criteria Description
New Knowledge and Two More Questions
5. Target 5 points
Reflection skillfully includes what is known now that should have been included in
the induction plan as well as specifically provides answers to two additional
questions.
4. Acceptable 4.35 points
Reflection considerably includes what is known now that should have been included
in the induction plan as well as soundly provides answers to two additional
questions.
3. Approaching 3.7 points
Reflection ambiguously includes what is known now that should have been included
in the induction plan as well as weakly provides answers to two additional
questions.
2. Insufficient 3.45 points
Reflection inadequately includes what is known now that should have been
included in the induction plan and does not provide answers to two additional
questions.
PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and Implications for Future Practice 15 points
Criteria Description
PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and Implications for Future Practice
5. Target 15 points
Reflection proficiently discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and any other standards that apply are
expertly incorporated into reflection.
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
Reflection logically discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and any other standards that apply are
accurately incorporated into reflection.
3. Approaching 11.1 points
Reflection inexplicitly discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and any other standards that apply are vaguely
addressed.
2. Insufficient 10.35 points
Reflection unrealistically discusses implications for application as a future
practitioner. Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and any other standards that
apply are inaccurately addressed.
Organization 5 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target 5 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides
the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the
required word count.
4. Acceptable 4.35 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is
within a reasonable range of the required word count.
3. Approaching 3.7 points
The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with
a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the
required word count.
2. Insufficient 3.45 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The
ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the
summary is widely outside of the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing 2.5 points
Criteria Description
includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use
5. Target 2.5 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-
developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are
varied and engaging.
4. Acceptable 2.18 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder
comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some
practice and content-related language.
3. Approaching 1.85 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent
language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.
2. Insufficient 1.72 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
1. No Submission 0 points
Documentation of Sources 2.5 points
Criteria Description
citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style
5. Target 2.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style. Format is free of error.
4. Acceptable 2.18 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Approaching 1.85 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
key formatting and citation errors are present.
2. Insufficient 1.72 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Total 50 points
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteEdu. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
Do you need help with this question?
Get assignment help from WriteEdu.com Paper Writing Website and forget about your problems.
WriteEdu provides custom & cheap essay writing 100% original, plagiarism free essays, assignments & dissertations.
With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.