11 Dec In order to provide effective professional development, feedback i
In order to provide effective professional development, feedback is needed. This assignment asks that you share your professional development presentation with your principal mentor and obtain feedback so that you can improve the session.
Allocate at least 2 hours in the field to support this field experience.
Share the professional development presentation and evaluation with your principal mentor. Ask your principal mentor for specific feedback on how you could improve the session, engage teachers, and create accountability.
Additionally, share your presentation and evaluation with a peer or similar grade-level teacher. Ask them to review your presentation and discuss with them how it would be presented to a group. Use the evaluation as a guide to explore how you could improve the professional development.
Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the principal mentor and, provided permission, seek opportunities to observe and/or assist the principal mentor.
Complete a 250-500 word reflection on your experiences. Incorporate PSEL Standards 6 and 7 into your reflection, along with any additional PSEL standards you choose, and describe how you will apply what you have learned to your future professional practice.
Submit your reflection along with your notes from each interview as one deliverable.
APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, but solid academic writing is expected. The PSEL standards should be referenced using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Clinical Field Experience C: Professional Development for Improving Teaching
Strategies – Rubric
Professional Development Presentation and Evaluation 15 points
Criteria Description
Professional Development Presentation and Evaluation
5. Target 15 points
Reflection on professional development presentation, including discussion of
evaluation received and changes that could be made to improve the presentation,
engage teachers, and create accountability is thorough and includes substantial
supporting details.
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
Reflection on professional development presentation, including discussion of
evaluation received and changes that could be made to improve the presentation,
engage teachers, and create accountability is complete and contains supporting
details.
3. Approaching 11.1 points
Reflection on professional development presentation, including discussion of
evaluation received and changes that could be made to improve the presentation,
engage teachers, and create accountability is vague and lacks supporting details.
2. Insufficient 10.35 points
Reflection on professional development presentation, including discussion of
evaluation received and changes that could be made to improve the presentation,
engage teachers, and create accountability is incomplete.
Peer Evaluation 10 points
Criteria Description
Peer Evaluation
5. Target 10 points
Reflection on sharing the presentation with a peer and suggested improvements is
thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable 8.7 points
Collapse All
Reflection on sharing the presentation with a peer and suggested improvements is
complete and contains supporting details.
3. Approaching 7.4 points
Reflection on sharing the presentation with a peer and suggested improvements is
vague and lacks supporting details.
2. Insufficient 6.9 points
Reflection on sharing the presentation with a peer and suggested improvements is
incomplete.
PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and Implications for Future Practice 15 points
Criteria Description
PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and Implications for Future Practice
5. Target 15 points
Reflection proficiently discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and any other standards that apply are
expertly incorporated into reflection.
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
Reflection logically discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and any other standards that apply are
accurately incorporated into reflection.
3. Approaching 11.1 points
Reflection inexplicitly discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and any other standards that apply are vaguely
addressed.
2. Insufficient 10.35 points
Reflection unrealistically discusses implications for application as a future
practitioner. Elements of PSEL Standards 6 and 7 and any other standards that
apply are inaccurately addressed.
Organization 5 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target 5 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides
the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the
required word count.
4. Acceptable 4.35 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is
within a reasonable range of the required word count.
3. Approaching 3.7 points
The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with
a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the
required word count.
2. Insufficient 3.45 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The
ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the
summary is widely outside of the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing 2.5 points
Criteria Description
includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use
5. Target 2.5 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-
developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are
varied and engaging.
4. Acceptable 2.18 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder
comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some
practice and content-related language.
3. Approaching 1.85 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent
language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.
2. Insufficient 1.72 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
1. No Submission 0 points
Documentation of Sources 2.5 points
Criteria Description
citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style
5. Target 2.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style. Format is free of error.
4. Acceptable 2.18 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Approaching 1.85 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
key formatting and citation errors are present.
2. Insufficient 1.72 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. No Submission 0 points Total 50 points
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteEdu. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
Do you need help with this question?
Get assignment help from WriteEdu.com Paper Writing Website and forget about your problems.
WriteEdu provides custom & cheap essay writing 100% original, plagiarism free essays, assignments & dissertations.
With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.