Chat with us, powered by LiveChat You are tasked with the responsibility of writing a 1-2 page position paper ?on the subject: Should We Permit A Market In The Selling and Buying Human Kidneys? To aid in the co - Writeedu

You are tasked with the responsibility of writing a 1-2 page position paper ?on the subject: Should We Permit A Market In The Selling and Buying Human Kidneys? To aid in the co

You are tasked with the responsibility of writing a 1-2 page position paper  on the subject: Should We Permit A Market In The Selling and Buying Human Kidneys? To aid in the completion of the task, you are required to read and digest a classis argument in favor of such a market that was advanced by Gary S. Becker.

More particularly, your position paper should

Accurately summarize the economic argument that Becker uses to advance and support his argument. Be especially alert to any economic concepts and/or principles that he employs

Cite data relevant to this issue and hyperlink the source(s) from which the data is drawn: How many people die each year from the inability to secure a kidney? Is Kidney disease more prevalent amongst some demographic groups than others?

Identify, retrieve, and read one article that opposes the argument advanced by people like Becker. Be sure to identify to identify any economic or moral principles that the author uses to support her/his position. Provide your instructor with a hyperlink to all sources.

Take a position and be able to briefly defend that position.

How Uncle Sam Could Ease the Organ Shortage

Gary S. Becker. Business Week. New York: Jan 20, 1997. Iss. 3510; pg. 18.

Improvements during the past decade in the safety and effectiveness of liver, heart, and

kidney transplants induced a rapid growth in the demand for organs, which now far

exceeds supply. It is essential to find ways to raise the supply of organs and ease the

suffering and long wait that many sick persons now endure. That delay can cost lives:

Almost 70 persons die each month while waiting for livers to become available.

The waiting period varies enormously from state to state. Transplant candidates may

receive a liver in less than two weeks in Kansas, while in Massachusetts they can

languish for nearly two years. Political jockeying among hospitals is the reason for this

regional discrepancy in waiting times. Livers are allocated to patients in descending order

of degree of sickness in the regions where they become available, even if patients in other

regions are more likely to be helped, because smaller transplant centers fear that they

would be shut out of a national allocation. Although a national system would reduce

regional discrepancies in waiting times, it would not close the growing gap between an

increasing aggregate demand for liver transplants and a flat total supply.

There is a similar shortage of other organs. About 2,400 heart transplants were performed

in 1995, but almost 4,000 persons are on the registered waiting list for such a transplant.

The media heavily publicized the agonizing wait for a heart replacement in a New York

hospital this past summer by Frank Torre, the brother of the manager of the world

champion New York Yankees baseball team. The gaps between demand and supply are

even greater for kidney and lung transplants: More than 30,000 persons are waiting for

kidney transplants, while only about 10,000 of these were performed in 1995.

BETTER TECHNOLOGY. To satisfy the larger demand for transplants, a campaign was

started last spring, helped by Michael Jordan's participation, to encourage people to leave

their organs for transplant use after they die. Potentially, many more organs can become

available, since more than 2 million persons die annually in the U.S.–almost 100,000 in

accidents alone. Some states instruct individuals to indicate on driver's licenses whether

they give permission to have their organs donated upon death. Such information is

valuable to hospitals, since they must move quickly to preserve organs to be used for


If this campaign succeeds in inducing a sufficient number of people to allow their organs

to be used after they die, the supply of organs would be large enough to satisfy demand.

However, this does not seem likely because the number of persons who want transplants

is increasing quite sharply as transplant technology improves and costs fall.

Every system of assigning priorities for organ transplants when supply is too little to

satisfy demand raises difficult and largely unsolvable ethical issues about who should

receive the limited number of organs available. The only way to abolish the need to

decide who most deserves transplants is by sufficiently increasing the supply of organs.

MEDICAL ETHICS. When demand exceeds supply for ordinary goods, the price is

raised to suppliers in order to induce them to increase the quantities provided. Using

similar incentives would induce more people to allow their organs to be used for

transplants after they die. For example, the Federal government might be designated as

the only authority with the power to buy organs for transplants and would allocate them

to hospitals with patients that need transplants.

I realize that many people will be horrified by any proposal to use monetary incentives to

acquire organs for transplants from people who die. They consider the purchase of organs

to be immoral. They say it will take unfair advantage of poor people, that it will end up

favoring the rich, that it will be too costly. There may be still other objections. I suggest

considering the purchase of organs only because other modifications to the present

system so far have been grossly inadequate to end the shortage.

Currently, replacements for defective organs sometimes become available only when it is

too late to help, and the situation has worsened over time as the demand for transplants

has grown. A sizable increase in the supply of organs for transplants would be a boon to

all the sick people who require transplants, and it would end the uncertainty and long wait

for donor organs to become available. Some alternative solutions to eliminate the large

and growing shortage of vital organs must be found—be they monetary inducements or

more effective appeals to humanitarian motivations.

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteEdu. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

Do you need help with this question?

Get assignment help from Paper Writing Website and forget about your problems.

WriteEdu provides custom & cheap essay writing 100% original, plagiarism free essays, assignments & dissertations.

With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.

Click here to Place your Order Now