20 Mar Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation. ? ? The discussion must address the topic. R

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation.

The discussion must address the topic.

Rationale must be provided

400 words in your initial post by Wednesday 23:59 pm

Minimum of two scholarly references in APA format within the last five years published

You must post two answers to your peers  peers of 200 words by WED

Yanetsy filler

Full Practice Authority (FPA) legislation needs the support of physician organizations. So exactly what is FPA, you might ask? The term "full practice authority" describes the legal right of advanced practice registered nurses, such as nurse practitioners, to use their skills and knowledge in the field without reporting to a physician (Reese,2021). This legislation can improve things, but it may also encounter opposition from physicians' institutions; therefore, it is essential to work together when pursuing it. As discussed below, there are benefits and drawbacks to bringing nursing and physician groups together to lobby for FPA legislation.

The major objective of both nurses and doctors, as stated by Mason et al.(2020), is to make patient care easier. Consequently, combining efforts across the two fields can improve patient care. Together, these two fields can better advocate for FPA legislation, which benefits everyone. Together with improving communication, this can also aid in building trust between the two fields. The aforementioned is fundamental to successful healthcare teamwork between these disciplines (Mason et al.,2020).

 Another upside to working together is that it can help physicians' groups overcome the FPA law. Research suggests that physician groups may reject FPA legislation if they see it attacking their ability to practice medicine. Yet, if these two fields work together to improve these issues, they may also dispel any myths that people may have about this law. In addition, it can help physicians’ firms better understand the needs of nursing groups. That can help the relevant stakeholders talk to people and negotiate better.

Last but not least on the advantage list, boosting public support for FPA is made easier through collaboration with physician groups. Since the general public looks to physician groups as reliable resources, these groups can help spread the word about the benefits of FPA for patients, especially in underserved areas where nurse practitioners can play a crucial role in meeting the demand for primary care services (Reese, 2021).

Despite this, there are drawbacks to collaboration that should be noticed. To win over physician organizations, nursing institutions may have to water down certain provisions of FPA law. It is "usual for stakeholders to negotiate and compromise in the policy process," as Mason et al. (2020) stated. It means that nursing groups may have to compromise on certain provisions of FPA legislation to win over physician groups. Finding common ground might be worth it; in some situations, failure to it FPA legislation can result in a bill that is too weak to address the demands of advanced practice adequately registered nurses.

Another con is that collaboration could take long and postpone FPA legislation approval. As Mason et al. (2020) point out, policies take time to alter. More so, Since talks may drag on longer than planned, working with physician organizations can add another degree of complexity to the process. As an APRN, you know how irritating it may be to wait to use all your skills and knowledge in the field.

To sum up, physicians and nursing organizations must work together to advocate for FPA legislation. Improved patient outcomes may result from the above-described collaboration bringing new knowledge and resources to the table and helping to overcome resistance from medical organizations. Nonetheless, it is abundantly evident that the coalition may attempt to prevent FPA legislation through persuasion or by pushing for compromises that limit NPs' authority. In light of physicians' concerns regarding patient safety and healthcare system control, NPs and physician organizations would be advised to collaborate in drafting FPA legislation that benefits patients while addressing these issues.

HECTOR DIAS

Advantages and Disadvantages of Collaborating with Physician Organizations in Pursuing Full Practice Authority Legislation

Introduction

The scope of practice for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) has become a crucial topic in the healthcare industry. Pursuing Full Practice Authority (FPA) legislation aims to expand the scope of practice for APRNs. Collaboration with physician organizations is an essential factor in the success of pursuing FPA legislation. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation.

Advantages of Collaborating with Physician Organizations in Pursuing FPA Legislation

Improved Patient Safety

Collaborating with physician organizations ensures that patients receive high-quality care, and it helps to minimize the risk of medical errors. Collaboration between physicians and APRNs improves patient outcomes and patient safety. Physicians' experience and expertise in the field can guide APRNs, especially in complex cases.

Enhanced Healthcare Team Collaboration

Collaborating with physician organizations leads to better communication, collaboration, and coordination among healthcare providers, which leads to better patient care. APRNs can provide valuable contributions to the healthcare team, and collaboration with physicians ensures they are fully integrated. This integration improves the team's effectiveness, enhances healthcare outcomes, and increases patient satisfaction.

Support from Physician Organizations

Collaboration with physician organizations is essential when pursuing FPA legislation, as they significantly influence policymakers. The support of physician organizations can significantly influence the outcome of FPA legislation. When APRNs collaborate with physician organizations, it improves their chances of successfully pursuing FPA legislation.

Improved Public Perception

Collaboration with physician organizations helps to enhance the public's perception of APRNs. Physician organizations have significant public trust and support, and working with them helps build public trust in APRNs. This trust increases the number of patients seeking care from APRNs, which ultimately increases their demand (Lugo, 2016).

Disadvantages of Collaborating with Physician Organizations in Pursuing FPA Legislation

Conflicts of Interest

Physician organizations may have conflicting interests when it comes to FPA legislation. Physicians may view the expansion of APRNs' scope of practice as a threat to their professional autonomy and may be hesitant to support FPA legislation. Conflicts of interest may arise when physicians perceive that APRNs' expanded scope of practice would limit their earning potential.

Resistance to Change

Some physician organizations may resist change and, as a result, may be unwilling to collaborate with APRNs on FPA legislation. This resistance may stem from a lack of understanding of APRNs' value to the healthcare team. Physicians may feel threatened by the possibility of APRNs practicing independently, leading to resistance to change.

Different Perspectives

Physicians and APRNs have different perspectives on healthcare, which may result in conflicting views on FPA legislation. Physicians may view FPA legislation as a threat to their professional autonomy. In contrast, APRNs may view it as an opportunity to expand their practice scope and provide better patient care. These conflicting views may create tension and result in a lack of collaboration between APRNs and physicians.

Unequal Bargaining Power

Physician organizations have more bargaining power than APRNs, so APRNs may have to compromise on some issues when collaborating with physician organizations. The unequal bargaining power may lead to compromises that may not benefit APRNs (Van Der Biezen et al., 2017).

Conclusion

Collaboration with physician organizations is crucial when pursuing FPA legislation. The advantages of collaborating with physician organizations include improved patient safety, enhanced healthcare team collaboration, support from physician organizations, and improved public perception. However, the disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations include conflicts of interest, resistance to change, different perspectives, and unequal bargaining power. APRNs must be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation effectively. APRNs must also advocate for their profession and work to overcome the barriers that may arise during the collaboration process. By effectively collaborating with physician organizations, APRNs can help expand their scope of practice, improve patient care, and ultimately advance the healthcare industry.