|
NURS_8210_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
All documents from Part 1 are included in the Part 2 submission.
|
|
150 to >134.0 pts
Excellent
All documents and tracking tools submitted from Part 1 have been revised and accurately updated in detail to sufficiently support the proposed small nursing informatics project.
|
134 to >119.0 pts
Good
All documents and tracking tools submitted from Part 1 have been revised and updated to support the proposed small nursing informatics project.
|
119 to >104.0 pts
Fair
All documents and tracking tools submitted from Part 1 have been inaccurately or vaguely revised and may support the proposed small nursing informatics project.
|
104 to >0 pts
Poor
All documents and tracking tools from Part 1 have been inaccurately and vaguely revised, and do not lend support to the proposed small nursing informatics project, or it is missing.
|
|
150 pts
|
|
Is the project staying within scope?
|
|
40 to >35.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the project is staying within scope…. The response accurately and clearly adheres to the project scope provided in the final submission.
|
35 to >31.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains whether the project is staying within scope. … The response accurately adheres to the project scope provided in the final submission.
|
31 to >27.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the project is staying within scope. … The response inaccurately or vaguely adheres to the project scope provided in the final submission.
|
27 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the project is staying within scope, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely adheres to the project scope provided in the final submission, or it is missing.
|
|
40 pts
|
|
Were all of the gaps identified?
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether all the gaps were identified for the proposed small nursing informatics project. … The response accurately and clearly adheres to the Gap Analysis provided in the final submission.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains whether all the gaps were identified for the proposed small nursing informatics project…. The response accurately adheres to the Gap Analysis provided in the final submission.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether all the gaps were identified for the proposed small nursing informatics project. … The response inaccurately or vaguely adheres to the Gap Analysis provided in the final submission.
|
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether all the gaps were identified for the proposed small nursing informatics project, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely adheres to the Gap Analysis provided in the final submission, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
Is the project following the timeline?
|
|
40 to >35.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the project is following the timeline. … The response accurately and clearly adheres to the project timeline provided in the final submission.
|
35 to >31.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains whether the project is following the timeline. … The response accurately adheres to the project timeline provided in the final submission.
|
31 to >27.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the project is following the timeline. … The response inaccurately or vaguely adheres to the project timeline provided in the final submission.
|
27 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the project is following the timeline, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely adheres to the project timeline provided in the final submission, or it is missing.
|
|
40 pts
|
|
If you had a budget, is it on track?
|
|
40 to >35.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the project is adhering to the proposed budget.
|
35 to >31.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains whether the project is adhering to the proposed budget.
|
31 to >27.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the project is adhering to the proposed budget.
|
27 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the project is adhering to the proposed budget, or it is missing.
|
|
40 pts
|
|
Were all of the work activities correctly assigned?
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether all the work activities were correctly assigned. … The response accurately and clearly adheres to the Work Breakdown Structure provided in the final submission.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains whether all the work activities were correctly assigned. … The response accurately adheres to the Work Breakdown Structure provided in the final submission.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether all the work activities were correctly assigned. … The response inaccurately or vaguely adheres to the Work Breakdown Structure provided in the final submission.
|
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether all the work activities were correctly assigned, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely adheres to the Work Breakdown Structure provided in the final submission, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
Are team members responsible?
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether all team members were responsible for the proposed small nursing informatics project. … The response accurately and clearly adheres to the responsibility chart provided in the final submission.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains whether all team members were responsible for the proposed small nursing informatics project. … The response accurately adheres to the responsibility chart provided in the final submission.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether all team members were responsible for the proposed small nursing informatics project. … The response inaccurately or vaguely adheres to the responsibility chart provided in the final submission.
|
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether all team members were responsible for the proposed small nursing informatics project, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely adheres to the responsibility chart provided in the final submission, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
Did the project start on time, inline to meet due dates?
|
|
40 to >35.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the small nursing informatics project started on time and is inline to meet due dates. … The response accurately and clearly adheres to the Gantt chart provided in the final submission.
|
35 to >31.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains whether the small nursing informatics project started on time and is inline to meet due dates. … The response accurately adheres to the Gantt chart provided in the final submission.
|
31 to >27.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the small nursing informatics project started on time and is inline to meet due dates. … The response inaccurately or vaguely adheres to the Gantt chart provided in the final submission.
|
27 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the small nursing informatics project started on time and is inline to meet due dates, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely adheres to the Gantt chart provided in the final submission, or it is missing.
|
|
40 pts
|
|
Are you holding weekly status meetings and documented all activities? Are all team members in attendance and communicated with?
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether weekly status meetings and documentation of all activities for the project has occurred. … The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether all team members have participated, attended, and been in active communication for the project. … The response accurately and clearly adheres to the communication plan provided in the final submission.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains whether weekly status meetings and documentation of all activities for the project has occurred. … The response accurately explains whether all team members have participated, attended, and been in active communication for the project. … The response accurately adheres to the communication plan provided in the final submission.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether weekly status meetings and documentation of all activities for the project has occurred. … The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether all team members have participated, attended, and been in active communication for the project. … The response inaccurately or vaguely adheres to the communication plan provided in the final submission.
|
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether weekly status meetings and documentation of all activities for the project has occurred, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether all team members have participated, attended, and been in active communication for the project, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely adheres to the communication plan provided in the final submission, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
Are all changes approved and documented?
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteEdu. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
Do you need help with this question?
Get assignment help from WriteEdu.com Paper Writing Website and forget about your problems.
WriteEdu provides custom & cheap essay writing 100% original, plagiarism free essays, assignments & dissertations.
With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
Click here to Place your Order Now
| |
