10 Jun Evaluation TableUse this document to complete the evaluation tabl

Evaluation TableUse this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research  Full   citation of selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4 Dubin, J (2018)Pediatric obesity in primary practice. Pediatric   Nursing .44(4), 202-206.Hargreaves, m., Orfield, C., Honeycutt, T., Vine,   M., Cabili, C., Coffee- Boden, B., Fisher, S. (2017). Addressing childhood   obesity through multisector collaboration: Journal of community health, 42   (4) 656-663Kitson, S (2018). Intervention for weight in   obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer. Retrieved from https//www.waldenulibrary.orgRuopeng An, Mengmeng Ji, & Zhang.   (2017). Effectiveness of social media intervention on weight related behavior   and body weight status. American Journal of health behavior 41(6), 670-682 Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study Design/Method Describe the designand how the studywas carried out Sample/Setting The number andcharacteristics ofpatients,attrition rate, etc. Major   Variables StudiedList and   define dependent and independent variables MeasurementIdentify   primary statistics used to answer clinical questions Data   AnalysisStatistical   orqualitativefindings Findings   and RecommendationsGeneral   findings and recommendations of the research AppraisalDescribe   the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and   limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of   the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility   ofuse in   your practice?  General Notes/Comments   Levels of Evidence TableUse this document to complete the levels of evidence table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research  Author   and year of selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4  Study DesignTheoretical basis for the study Sample/Setting The number andcharacteristics ofpatients Evidence   Level *(I, II, or III) Outcomes General Notes/Comments* Evidence Levels: Level IExperimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis Level IIQuasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis Level IIINonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis Level IVRespected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence Level VLiterature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence   Outcomes Synthesis TableUse this document to complete the outcomes synthesis table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research  Author   and year of selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4  Sample/Setting The number andcharacteristics ofpatients Outcomes Key   Findings Appraisal   and Study Quality General Notes/Comments