24 Jul Randy Weaver Case B. Discuss the constitutional legality of the

Randy Weaver Case B. Discuss the constitutional legality of the action by applying the standard asproscribed in Graham v. Conner to determine if the action was justified: The actions ofthe police must be “objectively reasonable” when each these following 5 factors areconsidered:1. The severity of the crime in question2. The apparent threat posed by the suspect3. Whether the suspect was trying to resist or flee4. The 'reasonableness' of a particular use of force must be judged from theperspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision ofhindsight.”5. Actions are to judged from the perspective of aREASONABLE officer within a tense,rapidly – evolving situationC. In addition to the above, include in your presentation and written report, a responseto these questions:1. Was the action in all or part due to a “miscalculation, misperception ormisunderstanding”.2. Was any kind of bias indicated?3. In hindsight, recommend an acceptable alternate course of action?4. In your opinion, would the application of Procedural Justice protocols beeneffective? Why or why not?