26 Mar New practice approaches Interprofessional collaboration Health care delivery and clinical systems Ethical considerations i

Topic 3: Development Of Evidence-Based Practice Change Proposal I

The next step in developing an evidence-based practice change proposal for the capstone project is to conduct a thorough review of the literature pertaining to the chosen topic. In this topic, students will examine the research literature and utilize library resources to locate quality, peer-reviewed sources to support their chosen topic and solution. Students will use the PICOT question process to create a PICOT question for their topic.

Objectives:

1. Critique evidence-based research to support the development of the capstone project change proposal.

2. Create a PICOT question incorporating an evidence-based nursing practice intervention.

3. Create objectives for an evidence-based nursing practice change proposal.

4. Integrate reflective practice into the practicum reflective journal.

5. Demonstrate interprofessional collaboration during the creation of the capstone project change

DQ1

Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change.

DQ2

Name two different methods for evaluating evidence. Compare and contrast these two methods.

,

Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives

Benchmark

Review your problem or issue and the cultural assessment. Consider how the findings connect to your topic and intervention for your capstone change project. Write a list of three to five objectives for your proposed intervention. Below each objective, provide a one or two sentence rationale.

After writing your objectives, provide a rationale for how your proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

1.5:  Advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations.

,

PICOT Question Paper

Review your problem or issue and the study materials to formulate a PICOT question for your capstone project change proposal. A PICOT question starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention used to address the problem must be a nursing practice intervention. Include a comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process.  Formulate a PICOT question using the PICOT format (provided in the assigned readings) that addresses the clinical nursing problem.

The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project change proposal.

In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome.

Describe the problem in the PICOT question as it relates to the following:

1. Evidence-based solution

2. Nursing intervention

3. Patient care

4. Health care agency

5. Nursing practice

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. 

,

Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Rubric

Collapse All Professional Capstone And Practicum Reflective Journal – RubricCollapse All

New Practice Approaches

0 points

Criteria Description

New Practice Approaches

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporate additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are present, but they are incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are not present.

Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is not present.

Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.

Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is not present.

Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is not present.

Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)

0 points

Criteria Description

Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is not present.

Population Health Concerns

0 points

Criteria Description

Population Health Concerns

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is not present.

Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)

0 points

Criteria Description

Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.

Health Policy

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Policy

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Health policy information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Health policy information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is not present.

Leadership and Economic Models

0 points

Criteria Description

Leadership and Economic Models

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is not present.

Health Disparities

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Disparities

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is present Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is not present.

Outline of Overall Personal Discovery

0 points

Criteria Description

Outline of Overall Personal Discovery

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is not present.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.