30 Apr Identify potential barriers to the implementation of the change proposal. Integrate how the identified potential barriers will be overcome. In

Students will synthesize the components developed in prior topics to formulate a written evidence-based account of the capstone project. Additionally, the student will integrate the following into the written evidence-based account: a plan for evaluating the nursing intervention, a change or nursing theory, and a discussion on how potential barriers will be overcome.

Objectives:

1. Produce a written comprehensive evidence-based capstone project change proposal using components developed in prior topics of the course.

2. Integrate a plan for evaluating the nursing intervention in the written comprehensive evidence-based capstone project change proposal.

3. Integrate a change or nursing theory into the written comprehensive evidence-based capstone project change proposal.

4. Identify potential barriers to the implementation of the change proposal.

5. Integrate how the identified potential barriers will be overcome.

6. Integrate reflective practice into the practicum reflective journal.

7. Demonstrate interprofessional collaboration during the creation of the capstone project change proposal.

DQ1

Based on how you will evaluate your EBP project, which independent and dependent variables do you need to collect? Why?

DQ2

Not all EBP projects result in statistically significant results. Define clinical significance, and explain the difference between clinical and statistical significance. How can you use clinical significance to support positive outcomes in your project?

,

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

Rubric

View Rubric

Status

Assessment Traits

Benchmark

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Develop a 1,250-1,500 written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

1. Background

2. Clinical problem statement.

3. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system.

4. PICOT question.

5. Literature search strategy employed.

6. Evaluation of the literature.

7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized.

8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.

9. Discussion of how evidence-based practice was used in creating the intervention plan.

10. Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention.

11. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome.

12. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created.

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Question Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. 

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

1.1:     Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings.

2.2:     Comprehend nursing concepts and health theories.

3.2:     Implement patient care decisions based on evidence-based practice.

,

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal – Rubric

Collapse All Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal – RubricCollapse All

Revisions Incorporated as Directed by Instructor

10 points

Criteria Description

Revisions Incorporated as Directed by Instructor

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

All revisions are incorporated. The revision greatly improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

The key aspects were revised. The revision generally improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Most key aspects were revised. Some aspects are still vague or contain minor inaccuracies.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Revision is incomplete. Many aspects are still incomplete, inaccurate, or unclear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Revision is omitted.

Background

10 points

Criteria Description

Background

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Background of clinical problem are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Background of clinical problem are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Background of clinical problem are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Background of clinical problem is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Background of clinical problem omitted.

Clinical Problem Statement

10 points

Criteria Description

Clinical Problem Statement

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Clinical problem statement is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Clinical problem statement is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Clinical problem statement is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Clinical problem statement is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Clinical problem statement omitted.

Purpose of Change Proposal

10 points

Criteria Description

Purpose of Change Proposal

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is omitted.

PICOT Question

10 points

Criteria Description

PICOT Question

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Topic and most criteria are presented. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Topic is presented but criteria is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

PICOT questions is omitted.

Literature Search

10 points

Criteria Description

Literature Search

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Topic and most criteria are presented. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Topic is presented but criteria is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Literature search strategy employed omitted.

Evaluation of Literature

10 points

Criteria Description

Evaluation of Literature

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Evaluation of literature is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Evaluation of literature is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Evaluation of literature is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Evaluation of literature is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evaluation of literature omitted.

Change or Nursing Theory

10 points

Criteria Description

Change or Nursing Theory

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Change or nursing theory is logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Change or nursing theory is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Change or nursing theory is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Change or nursing theory is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Change or nursing theory omitted.

Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures

20 points

Criteria Description

Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures

5. 5: Excellent

20 points

Implementation plan and outcome measures are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

17.8 points

Implementation plan and outcome measures are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

15.8 points

Implementation plan and outcome measures are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

15 points

Implementation plan and outcome measures are presented is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Implementation plan and outcome measures are omitted.

Use of Evidence-Based Practice in Intervention Plan

20 points

Criteria Description

Use of Evidence-Based Practice in Intervention Plan

5. 5: Excellent

20 points

Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

17.8 points

Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

15.8 points

Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

15 points

Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan omitted.

Plan for Evaluating Proposed Nursing Intervention

20 points

Criteria Description

Plan for Evaluating Proposed Nursing Intervention

5. 5: Excellent

20 points

Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

17.8 points

Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

15.8 points

Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

15 points

Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention omitted.

Potential Barriers and Plan to Overcome Barriers

20 points

Criteria Description

Potential Barriers and Plan to Overcome Barriers

5. 5: Excellent

20 points

Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good

17.8 points

Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

3. 3: Satisfactory

15.8 points

Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

15 points

Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are omitted.

Thesis Development and Purpose

10 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

10 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

10 points

Criteria Description

Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. 5: Excellent

10 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good

8.9 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

4 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. 5: Excellent

4 points

All format elements are correct.

4. 4: Good

3.56 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. 3: Satisfactory

3.16 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

6 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. 5: Excellent

6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. 4: Good

5.34 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.74 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.5 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

,

3. Satisfactory

7.9 points

A THESE PICOT question is presented. The PICOT generally follows the correct format.

THESE ARE THE COMMENTS ON TNE RUBRIC, AND BELOW IS THE INSTRUCTOR COMMENT.

Criteria Comments

The topic was there with the supportive reference however you did not clearly state the PICOT statement with the measurable outcome in the introduction

expand Nursing Intervention assessment

Nursing Intervention

8.9 / 1012345

4. Good

8.9 points

A nursing intervention used to address the problem is presented. A comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and timeframe needed to implement the change process, are discussed.

Criteria Comments

you needed to add the supportive reference

expand Clinical Problem and Patient Outcome assessment

Clinical Problem and Patient Outcome

8.9 / 1012345

4. Good

8.9 points

The clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome are presented. Some minor detail is needed for clarity.

Criteria Comments

this needed expanded with the supportive reference

expand PICOT Problem assessment

PICOT Problem

8.9 / 1012345

4. Good

8.9 points

The PICOT problem as it relates to evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patent care, health care agency, and nursing practice is described. Some minor detail is needed for clarity.

Criteria Comments

the PICOT statement needed to also have a measurable outcome.

expand Thesis Development and Purpose assessment

Thesis Development and Purpose

2.23 / 2.512345

4. Good

2.23 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Criteria Comments

this area could have been expanded

expand Argument Logic and Construction assessment

Argument Logic and Construction

1.98 / 2.512345

3. Satisfactory

1.98 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Criteria Comments

you needed to also add the supportive reference

expand Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

2.23 / 2.512345

4. Good

2.23 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Criteria Comments

No comments.

expand Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) assessment

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0.89 / 112345

4. Good

0.89 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

Criteria Comments

you needed to have a summary conclusion for your paper and the future papers

expand Documentation of Sources assessment

Documentation of Sources

1.34 / 1.512345

4. Good

1.34 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Criteria Comments

the list of references seem to support your to but needed to be use as intext citation throughout y your paper

THIS IS THE INSTRUCTOR COMMENT FROM WEEK 3 PICOT QUESTION

Instructor Comments

The topic was there with the supportive reference however you did not clearly state the PICOT statement with the measurable outcome and the list of references seem to support your to but needed to be use as intext citation throughout y your paper

THIS IS INSTRUCTOR COMMENT FROM WK6 LITERAL REVIEW

Instructor Comments

thanks for your summary of the topic with the supportive reference and  the list of reference seem to support your topic