14 Jan Quality of Work No correction

MKT607 Marketing Management

Week 7 Assignment

Peer Review

Complete “MKT-607 Peer Review” form on the overall group experience. It is important to provide feedback that assists the instructor in identifying the roles and performances of all team members. This assignment is only to be viewed by the instructor.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Complete this peer evaluation for each member of your team, including yourself. The average score from these evaluations will be used in determining your final grade for the assignment.

Rate each team member on a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being the highest. Use the rubric on the second page to determine the score for each team member. Include comments explaining why you gave your teammate this score.

Your peer evaluations will be kept strictly confidential. Your grade for the evaluation will be posted in the gradebook as an assignment, but individual ratings will not be shared.

Group member: List names

Rating: 1 – 100

Comments: Must be completed for each team member.

1. Your name

2.

3.

4.

5

6.

After the total for each student has been added together, and divided by the number of team members rating him/her; calculate the following: ___/100 x 2% =____ out of 2 points for this evaluation.

CATEGORY 100-93 pts (A) Excellent 92-83 pts (B) Good 82-73 pts (C) Improving 72-0 pts (D) Needs Improvement

Contributions Routinely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. Contributes a lot of effort. Usually provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A good group member who tries hard. Sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A satisfactory group member who does what is required. Rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. May refuse to participate.

Quality of Work No correction or revision necessary, work is complete and of high quality. Revisions and corrections may not be necessary and work is adequate for what is needed. Some revision and/or correction is needed or work is not always completed in the manner required. Work provided constantly needs correction and revision and is often incomplete.

Time-management All work is turned in on time or even earlier than necessary, the team member is reliable for posting/submitting whole pieces that the group has put together and responsibilities never need to be reassigned to compensate. Work is, for the most part, on time and, on a few occasions, early. For the most part, the team member is reliable for submitting completed team documents. Group member does not need to be compensated for. Occasionally the work is on time. Rarely is it early. On one or two occasions did the rest of the group need to compensate for missing or late work. Occasionally the work is on time and is never early. Team member cannot be relied on to turn in team documents and other members sometimes must compensate for tardiness of work assigned.

Attitude Always has a positive attitude about the project and works well with the other team members. Any criticism given is constructive. Usually has a positive attitude toward the work and group, but conflict is usually minor. Any criticism is often constructive. Attitude is hit or miss toward project and group, but member is for the most part tolerable. Criticism given is, on occasion, constructive, if given at all. Rarely has a positive attitude; participation, quality of work, and time management is severely affected by such; and team member has difficulties and conflict with group.