13 Jan Discussion:Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion:Health N

Discussion:Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion:Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion:Health Nursing M1D4 ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:Discussion:Health Nursing M1D4 Strengthen Your Knowledge of EBP Instructions: Discussion:Health Nursing M1D4 Review the following website:http://www.umassmed.edu/ Then answer the following questions:How did the information you got from the website contribute to your knowledge of EBP? How might this information influence your use of EBP in your clinical practice? Be sure to clearly indicate which article you read in your answer. Your response should be 50 – 100 words. Please respond to at least one (1) of your classmates. You will be graded as follows:Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion Essay ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE Complete answer(s) to prompt(s) using standard English grammar and spelling; length of post complies with directions; and references are cited as per directions 80% Response to one classmate using standard English grammar and spelling; references are cited per directions. Your comment(s) must be substantial. Do not just stay “I agree” or “Good point”. 10% Response to one more classmate using standard English grammar and spelling; references are cited per directions. Your comment(s) must be substantial. Do not just stay “I agree” or “Good point”. 10% Total 100% You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion Essay Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion Essay Nursing Assignment Question Students will critique (not describe) an online substance-use interview. Your critique will be based on information and interviewing techniques provided via online tutorial activities and other materials available on the Moodle site. You are to provide a written critique of an online substance-use interview (a link to this will be provided via the Moodle site in the ‘assessment 1′ folder). Your critique in essay format is to include the following sections: Exploration of the way in which the interviewer’s initial contact with the person occurred: • Examination of the levels of rapport and respect established by the interviewer; • The degree to which the interviewer addressed the person’s readiness to change their behavior/s; • The extent to which the interviewer identified the impact of lifestyle and substance use on the person’s health; •The extent to which the interviewer identified stresses related to the person’s substance use and lifestyle; • The overall level of engagement between the person and interviewer throughout the interview; •The manner to which the interview was concluded. Headings are to be used in your essay to identify each section. As part of your essay, you are to explain and justify your answers (citing appropriate literature). do not click here Read more in the complete solution PDF document at the end of this page. Nursing Assignment Solution INTRODUCTION Establishing therapeutic relationships with clients of co-occurring substance abuse is much difficult, yet an integral part of mental health care and rehabilitation (Mueser, et al., 2012). Assessment of client helps counselors and clinicians to assess the degree of severity of complexities and design treatment regimen with accordance to conditions (Delgadillo, et al., 2012). The chance of bias and judgmental conclusion in such cases run high, implicating there must be optimized protocol which act as a guideline for the assessor or the interviewer. Establishment of good rapport and relationship (therapeutic) is utmost important to win trust of client and retrieve information which will help in recovery of client (Stieglitz & Raes, 2015). This piece of article critically analyses an interview between pharmacotherapy counselor Jess and her client Steve. The interview was designed by Victoria initiative under dual diagnosis heading and issued as a training material for mental health workers and counselors. The video demonstrates how sensitive questioning should be carried out with clients of dual diagnosis.Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion Essay EXPLORATION OF INTERVIEWERS CONTACT Interviewers initial contact method as well as mechanism is the best predictor of health outcome in a psychological interview session (Copeland, McNamara, Kelson, & Simpson, 2014). From the video, it was evident Jess introduced herself as assessor who is there for a comprehensive assessment of substance abuse and dual diagnosis of Steve. She greets Steve and speaks three lines about her and starts with the questioning. Although, this is the standard method of interview, there is always room for improvement in case of initial contact. Research suggests clients are more interactive if they found counselors nurturing, non-judgmental and empathetic (Feit, Fisher, Cummings, & Peery, 2015). Jess could have established better initial contact by asking general questions about breakfast, about day’s start, planning for the day, etc. The rationale is to bring client in a zone of trust and comfort (Brown, Bennett, Li, & Bellack, 2011). Evidence shows, individuals suffering from dual diagnosis are usually looking down by the society and community which limits their societal functioning. This in turn affects their self-integrity and self-esteem (Chou, Robb, Clay, & Chronister, 2012). The video shows, the client although nods to interviewer for a session, he was unable to make eye contact which might be due to low self-esteem. During initial stage of interview he looks towards wall clock for time, indicating he might have some works and he might be in a hurry to complete the session (Darghouth, Nakash, O. Miller, & Alegría, 2012). Therefore, taking the client into a therapeutic zone of trust, belief and showing client that they are normal individuals and can be brought to mainstream society with little self help boost their confidence (Hettema & TKirsch, 2011). In the interview session the counselor asks Steve ‘Have you been to such service before?’ Although the guidelines from Victoria initiative about sensitive questioning suggest non-judgmental questions and open ended question should be asked, the above question indicates it is judgmental and concluding that Steve needs an assessment for his problem. If the question would have been asked – Have you availed any medical service for any ailments or mental health issues? , it would have a greater therapeutic binding effect on client. In most cases, clients of dual diagnosis are demoralized by society’s perception and portray of their personalities as bad guys, therefore establishment of therapeutic relationship although very difficult yet it exists for dual diagnosis patients (Van Boekel, Brouwers, Van Weeghel, & Garretsen, 2012). The communication plays the most important role from start to end in an interview session.Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion Essay EXAMINATION OF INTERVIEWERS RAPPORT AND RESPECT Establishing rapport is an important aspect while assessing clients for substance abuse or dual diagnosis. Establishing rapport is a part of motivational interview usually employed for certain group of people, but can be implemented in general interviewing session too (Ness, Borg, & Davidson, 2014). Establishment of rapport requires a little bit of information on client’s choice, social history or his/her preference for a particular problem or issue (DeVido & Weiss, 2012). In this case, although interviewer successfully established respect with Steve evident from the total interview, rapport could have been enhanced based upon evidence based literature. Building rapport helps in establishing a working alliance for a longer duration (Clarkson, et al., 2013). Jess introduces the service which she will be providing and clears him through her words that she is there for a normal assessment which Steve acknowledges positively. This indicates interviewer’s establishment of respect and client’s acknowledgement of interviewers intentional questioning with respect. As discussed in previous section, therapeutic alliance is necessary for proper assessment; similarly rapport establishment indicates the interviewers respect to client, his work, and client as a whole different entity (Madson, et al., 2013). It makes the session more interactive by placing client’s choice in first priority rather than interviewers goals. Respect for autonomy, genuineness and collaboration helps in establishing rapport. Jess shows good listening skills and engaging communication skills during the whole interview which is an important part of rapport building too (Prout & Wadkins, 2014). The building of acceptance and safety environment is crucial for rapport establishment which was lacking and it seems counselor jumped to main issue prematurely which could have logically placed after establishing therapeutic relationship and rapport. Health Nursing M1D4 Discussion ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.