Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Week 1 DQ (Due in 24 hours)/Lerning Resources.docx - Writeedu

Week 1 DQ (Due in 24 hours)/Lerning Resources.docx

Week 1 DQ (Due in 24 hours)/Lerning Resources.docx

Learning Resources

Required Readings

 

Bacanu, B. (2016). Competitive advantage: “The emperor has no clothes!”. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series V: Economic Sciences, 9(1), 99–106. 

 

 

Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review, 81(5), 41–49.

 

 

Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37–74.

 

 

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 62–77. 

 

Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.

 

 

Purkayastha, A., & Sharma, S. (2016). Gaining competitive advantage through the right business model: Analysis based on case studies. Journal of Strategy and Management, 9(2), 138–155. doi:10.1108/JSMA-07-2014-0060

 

 

Optional Resources

 

Ashtiani, Z. M., & Karimi, S. (2016). A study on effect of market orientation and Michael Porter’s Five Competitive Forces on performance of Bahman Group. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 7(5), 228–241. Retrieved from https://bipublication.com/files/ijabr20160528_Sharif.pdf

 

Christensen, C. M., Bartman, T., & van Bever, D. (2016). The hard truth about business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 31–40. Retrieved from http://mitsmr.com/2cBmhTk

 

Diana, C., Mirela, I., & Sorin, M. (2017). Approaches on the relationship between competitive strategies and organizational performance through the Total Quality Management (TQM). Quality – Access to Success, 18(S1), 328–333. Retrieved from http://www.srac.ro/calitatea/en/

 

Viltard, L. A. (2017). Strategic mistakes (avoidable): The topicality of Michel Porter’s generic strategies. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 8(2), 474–497. doi:10.14807/ijmp.v8i2.580

 

Week 1 DQ (Due in 24 hours)/Week 1 DQ (Required Assignment).docx

My Note: (Required minimum 3-4 Pages)

 

(100% Original Plagiarism free work) Due in 24 hours

 

Must be include all assignment requirement and follow Rubric Superior Criteria

 

Course: Seminar in IT for Competitive Advantage

 

Discussion: Foundations for Competitive Advantage

 

An organization must have a deep understanding of its underlying capabilities and processes in order to successfully use its information technologies to achieve a strategic advantage.

To prepare for this Discussion, review the Learning Resources for this week and conduct further research of models for IT contributing to competitive advantage.

 

By Day 3

 

Post an assessment of the influence of IT in the creation of competitive advantage in organizations, incorporating the Required Readings on strategy and competition. In your assessment, address the following:

 

· What is competitive advantage and what are the ways it is created?

· How does IT contribute to competitives advantage?

· What are the risks associated with using technology for competitive advantage?

· Also, include in your post a current theory related to IT for competitive advantage. Select a theory that extends beyond the resources provided in the readings for this week and involve your own research in the Walden Library using recent peer-reviewed sources. For the theory, provide a summary using these section headings:

 

· The name of the theory

· The year the theory was introduced

· The theorist/author

· Key components of the theory

· A statement of how the theory does or does not apply

 

Be sure to support your work with a minimum of three specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and at least one additional scholarly source.

 

Refer to the Week 1 Discussion Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.

 

 

Rubric Detail

 

 

Superior Criteria

Excellent Criteria

Satisfactory Criteria

Marginal Criteria

Unsatisfactory Criteria

Not Submitted

Element 1a: Initial Post – Competitive Advantage

7.5 (10%)

Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of competitive advantage and the ways it is created. Several sources and examples support thinking.

7.12 (9.5%)

Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of competitive advantage and the ways it is created. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors.

6.38 (8.5%)

Student presents an explanation with some details of competitive advantage and the ways it is created. Some sources and examples support thinking.

5.62 (7.5%)

Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details of competitive advantage and the ways it is created. Few sources or examples support thinking.

3.75 (5%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

(0%)

Did not submit element.

Element 1b: Initial Post – IT and Competitive Advantage

7.5 (10%)

Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of how IT contributes to competitive advantage and the risks associated with using technology for competitive advantage. Several sources and examples support thinking.

7.12 (9.5%)

Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of how IT contributes to competitive advantage and the risks associated with using technology for competitive advantage. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors.

6.38 (8.5%)

Student presents an explanation with some details of how IT contributes to competitive advantage and the risks associated with using technology for competitive advantage. Some sources and examples support thinking.

5.62 (7.5%)

Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details of how IT contributes to competitive advantage and the risks associated with using technology for competitive advantage. Few sources or examples support thinking.

3.75 (5%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

(0%)

Did not submit element.

Element 1c: Initial Post – Theory Related to IT for Competitive Advantage

(12%)

Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of a current theory related to IT for competitive advantage that includes the name of the theory, year the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and how the theory does or does not apply. Several sources and examples support thinking.

8.55 (11.4%)

Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of a current theory related to IT for competitive advantage that includes the name of the theory, year the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and how the theory does or does not apply. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors in table/evaluation.

7.65 (10.2%)

Student presents an evaluation of a current theory related to IT for competitive advantage that includes the name of the theory, year the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and how the theory does or does not apply. Some sources and examples support thinking.

6.75 (9%)

Student presents a cursory or incomplete evaluation of a current theory related to IT for competitive advantage that includes the name of the theory, year the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and how the theory does or does not apply. Few sources or examples support thinking.

4.5 (6%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

(0%)

Did not submit element.

Element 1d: Scholarly Sources for Initial Post

(8%)

Student supports his/her initial post with a minimum of three specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources.

5.7 (7.6%)

Student supports his/her initial post with a minimum of three specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources. There are one or two minor errors in format or relevance of sources.

5.1 (6.8%)

Student supports his/her initial post with only two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources.

4.5 (6%)

Student supports his/her initial post with at least one scholarly source provided.

(4%)

Does not meet minimal standards and/or no sources supported post.

(0%)

Did not submit element.

Element 2: Response to Colleagues’ Postings

22.5 (30%)

Responses fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes to more than two peers with a minimum of one appropriately cited scholarly reference for each response.

21.38 (28.5%)

Responses fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes to at least two peers with a minimum of one appropriately cited scholarly reference for each response. There are one or two minor errors.

19.12 (25.5%)

Responses somewhat contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes to at least two peers with a minimum of one appropriately cited scholarly reference for each response.

16.88 (22.5%)

Responses do not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes to at least two peers with at least one scholarly source provided for each response.

11.25 (15%)

Does not meet minimal standards and/or no sources supported response.

(0%)

Did not submit element.

Element 3: Written Delivery Style & Grammar

11.25 (15%)

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

10.69 (14.25%)

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

9.56 (12.75%)

Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

8.44 (11.25%)

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

5.62 (7.5%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

(0%)

Did not submit element.

Element 4: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)

11.25 (15%)

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

10.69 (14.25%)

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.

9.56 (12.75%)

Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

8.44 (11.25%)

Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

5.62 (7.5%)

Does not meet minimal standards.

(0%)

Did not submit element.

 

Resources

Required Readings

 

Bacanu, B. (2016). Competitive advantage: “The emperor has no clothes!”. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series V: Economic Sciences, 9(1), 99–106. 

 

 

Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review, 81(5), 41–49.

 

 

Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37–74.

 

 

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 62–77. 

 

Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.

 

 

Purkayastha, A., & Sharma, S. (2016). Gaining competitive advantage through the right business model: Analysis based on case studies. Journal of Strategy and Management, 9(2), 138–155. doi:10.1108/JSMA-07-2014-0060

 

Optional Resources

 

Ashtiani, Z. M., & Karimi, S. (2016). A study on effect of market orientation and Michael Porter’s Five Competitive Forces on performance of Bahman Group. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 7(5), 228–241. Retrieved from https://bipublication.com/files/ijabr20160528_Sharif.pdf

 

Christensen, C. M., Bartman, T., & van Bever, D. (2016). The hard truth about business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 31–40. Retrieved from http://mitsmr.com/2cBmhTk

 

Diana, C., Mirela, I., & Sorin, M. (2017). Approaches on the relationship between competitive strategies and organizational performance through the Total Quality Management (TQM). Quality – Access to Success, 18(S1), 328–333. Retrieved from http://www.srac.ro/calitatea/en/

 

Viltard, L. A. (2017). Strategic mistakes (avoidable): The topicality of Michel Porter’s generic strategies. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 8(2), 474–497. doi:10.14807/ijmp.v8i2.580

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteEdu. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

Do you need help with this question?

Get assignment help from WriteEdu.com Paper Writing Website and forget about your problems.

WriteEdu provides custom & cheap essay writing 100% original, plagiarism free essays, assignments & dissertations.

With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.

Click here to Place your Order Now